Monetary remedies for breach of human rights : a comparative study / Lisa Tortell.
2006
C200 TOR
Available at Brisbane
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Monetary remedies for breach of human rights : a comparative study / Lisa Tortell.
Author
ISBN
1841135119
Imprint
Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd., 2006.
Language
English
Description
xix, 215 p.
Call Number
C200 TOR
Summary
This book constructs a framework which allows a greater understanding of domestic causes of action for breaches of human rights seeking a monetary remedy. The first part describes the cause of action in three jurisdictions: the USA, India and New Zealand. The book concludes that a common generic structure of the cause of action exists and can be used as a guide by other jurisdictions in which such a cause of action either exists or will develop.
Note
This book constructs a framework which allows a greater understanding of domestic causes of action for breaches of human rights seeking a monetary remedy. The first part describes the cause of action in three jurisdictions: the USA, India and New Zealand. The book concludes that a common generic structure of the cause of action exists and can be used as a guide by other jurisdictions in which such a cause of action either exists or will develop.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Formatted Contents Note
1. Introduction
Part I. Jurisdictions
2. United States of America: Section 1983 and Bivens
3. India: Article 32
4. New Zealand: Baigent's Case
Part II. Comparative Analysis
5. Structure of the cause of action
6. Overarching influences
Part III. Turning the analysis around
7. The United Kingdom Human Rights Act 1998
8. Conclusion.
Part I. Jurisdictions
2. United States of America: Section 1983 and Bivens
3. India: Article 32
4. New Zealand: Baigent's Case
Part II. Comparative Analysis
5. Structure of the cause of action
6. Overarching influences
Part III. Turning the analysis around
7. The United Kingdom Human Rights Act 1998
8. Conclusion.
Series
Human rights law in perspective
Human rights law in perspective.
Human rights law in perspective.
Record Appears in